The Origins Of Water Fluoridation
This post was written by whitey on December 3, 2008
Posted Under: History of Fluoridation
Posted Under: History of Fluoridation
HISTORY OF FLUORIDE << PART I: ORIGINS >> << PART II: THE ALUMINUM CONNECTION >>.
| A not yet understood substance in water that 1, caused the presence of multiple teeth, pitting and cracking enamel, and white or brown spots. And, 2, showed decreased dental decay. This leads a group of dental professionals into years of yet unsolved answers. How is it that a chief chemist working for the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA) is so interested as to discover and reveal the long unsolved mystery? The answer comes through asking the question.. “What reason would the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA)have interest and of what benefit”? |
The origins of the dental application of what we associate the use of FLUORIDE, begins with an individual at the dawn of his yet to be recognized career in orthodontic dentistry. It was 1901, yet to be doctor, “Fredrick McKay” was in Colorado Springs working as a dental associate for $75.00/ month. In this work McKay noticed patients with the presence of multiple teeth with white or brown spots (later termed “Colorado Brown Stain”) and in severe cases the enamel was pitted. He became disturbed that many of his fellow practitioners were apathetic about identifying the cause and solution to this cosmetic problem.
By 1905 Fredrick McKay had become interested in orthodontics and moved to St. Louis to begin his orthodontic training. While in St. Louis he noticed the brown stain was prevalent in that region, also. He continued his research in the area but was unable to find an answer.
In 1908 he returned to Colorado Springs due to health reasons and practiced orthodontics while continuing to investigate of the “Colorado Brown Stain“.
In May, 1908 he and other members of the El Paso County Odontological Society presented a patient at the Colorado Dental Association meeting to illustrate and promote interest in the condition. To his dismay little interest was manifested by those at the meeting.
In December, 1908 a committee consisting of Drs. McKay, Fleming and Burton was formed by the El Paso County Odonological Society to examine the teeth of the public school children in the Colorado Springs area for evidence of the “Brown Stain”. On January 8, 1909 the School Board granted permission to examine the children and the dental society allocated $21.00 to cover the cost of the exams. During the spring of 1909 they examined 2945 children and were astounded to find that 87.5 percent were afflicted with some degree of stain or mottling, and those afflicted were native to the Pikes Peak region. There were many theories for the cause of the stain. Some felt it was limited to the poor; others felt it was due to eating too much pork or drinking milk from local cows; others attributed it to radium and still others thought it was due to a calcium deficiency in the local drinking water
Funding was minimal and Dr. McKay primarily used his own funds to support his research. In 1910 he was granted $300.00 from the City of Colorado Springs. The next year, while serving as president of the Colorado Dental Association, he received $150.00 to assist with his study. He applied for and received the first research grant for $800.00 from the National Dental Association to continue his research.
By 1915 it was agreed that something in the water was causing the brown stain. But test after test failed to identify the critical substance.
| Excerpt from “Origins Part II: Fifteen year dental research mystery solved by Aluminum Industry: The first answer to mystery covering a total of 30 years came from research done by Dr. H. V. Churchill, chief chemist for the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA). Dr. Churchill had read Dr. McKay’s report and ordered a specific test to identify trace elements. His studies revealed an unusually high percentage of fluoride in the water where mottled enamel and brown staining occurred. (hence the term.. “Dental Fluorisis”) The news about fluoride was exciting to McKay, though he did not know how the ALCOA chemist “got in touch with the situation”. When he asked Branting the latter did not explain that he kept the ALCOA people up-to-date about his correspondence with McKay and any developments, but replied: “I believe his attention was drawn to the situation by the publicity our town received in the newspapers through the release recently by ´Science Service´ of an item on the subject” read in “Part II, The Aluminum Connection |

