THE WATER WE DRINK…

Cavities: Fluoridated to Non-Fluoridated Water Comparisons

The Truth About Fluoride And Cavities!

Ever Sense The Earliest Research Studies It Was Known And Documented: “Fluoride interferes with proper development of permanent teeth in children”. As a result, permanent teeth erupt later than normal. (see insert)

Trendley Dean, DDS, the original promoter of water fluoridation as an effective tool in fighting dental decay, admitted over 50 years ago under oath, that his data purporting to prove the fluoridation hypothesis were not valid. (H. Trendley Dean: Proceedings, City of Oroville vs. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Oroville, California, Oroville, California, October 20-21, 1955.)… also… (See 4-1: “Fluoridation Benefits — Statistical Illusion.” Testimony of Konstantin K. Paluev, Research and Development Engineer, Mar. 6, 1957).

Put simply, teeth that have not yet erupted cannot begin to show signs of decay! (before ingesting fluoride) had adult teeth to develop cavities in! The result is the illusion of dental health until they reach the age of 12 or 13 years of age, at which time their statistics catch up to them. Suddenly, children in area’s with fluoridated water begin to emerge with more dental decay then their non fluoridated neighbors, not to mention they have unnecessarily exposed themselves, or should I say, we, their parents have unnecessarily allowed exposure to dental fluorosis which in all reality is the exposed area of our inner unseen skeletal selves, which translates.. skeletal fluorosis. What is skeletal fluorosis?

Therefore, at first (at age 6) fluoridated children had 100% less tooth decay, by age 7 also 100% less, age 8 – 67% less, age 9 – 50% less, and by age 10 – 40% less. Realizing their experiment was going downhill, the USPHS stopped their experiment early, totaled the five reductions shown, then divided by 5 to obtain what they called “an over-all reduction of 70%.” Obviously, the only reduction that really counted at that time was the 40% (age 10).

Had the Health Department continued their survey beyond age 10, they would have found that the percentage of reduction continued down hill to 30%, 20%, 0%, and eventually these children had more cavities — not less. The rate of decay is identical, once the children’s teeth erupt. (see fluoridedebate.com)

Now, compare the above paragraph data to (early 1980’s) research study statistics (see excerpt below) of “Dr. John Colquhoun“, Principal Dental Officer, for the city of Auckland, New Zealand, and chairman of the national “Fluoridation Promotion Committee.”to discontinue his pro fluoridation stature and spend the rest of his life calling for the banning of fluoridation. EXCERPT: “the percentage of 12- and 13-year-old children who were free of tooth decay – that is, had perfect teeth – was greater in the non-fluoridated part of the district”. read the entire article here… "WHY I CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT WATER FLUORIDATION“

When fighting dental decay no longer proves to be a valid argument for water fluoridation, why are communities around the U.S. continuing to dish out $$$$$$ to feed this “prescription drug classified chemical” to every child?